In terms of intelligence, which option is a consequence of effective declassification?

Effective declassification of information typically leads to enhanced public trust in government transparency. When governmental agencies make the decision to declassify sensitive information, they facilitate a greater understanding of their activities, decision-making processes, and the rationale behind actions taken in the name of national security. This openness can foster a relationship where the public feels more informed and engaged, ultimately promoting confidence in governmental institutions.

Increased national security might be a goal of declassification in certain instances, but declassification itself is more aligned with the opening up of information rather than restricting it. Similarly, restricted access to sensitive data contradicts the very nature of declassification, which aims to make information available to the public to some extent. Lastly, greater control over intelligence information is counterintuitive to the idea of declassification, as the act inherently involves relinquishing some control by allowing broader access to previously classified material. Therefore, enhancing public trust through transparency is the key consequence reflective of effective declassification.